3000GT/Stealth International Message Center - Reply to Topic
3000GT/Stealth International 3000GT/Stealth International
 

Auto Insurance

» Featured Product
Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   3000GT/Stealth International Message Center > Modifications and Technical Support > Audio/Video Systems > Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

3SI.org is the premier Mitsubishi 3000GT Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Thread: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the 3000GT/Stealth International Message Center forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Free email addresses do not work(yahoo, hotmail, gmail,...)
We are currently being blocked by AOL so any AOL based address may not work(aol.com, aim.com, netscape.net, cs.com)
Email Address:

Log-in


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
08-14-2019 08:31 PM
PhailosaurusRex
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightg35x View Post
For no particular reason, I'm just not a big kicker fan.
I figured that would be the case considering your ideal driver is a W3.

After looking at a number of pictures and estimating the dimensions, the internal volume should be in the ballpark of 0.12 cubes before displacement. 0.14 best case scenario.

The last pic here gives a pretty good idea of the face dimensions.
Stealth 316 - Speakers
08-14-2019 08:02 PM
midnightg35x
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhailosaurusRex View Post
One other consideration is excursion and how much clearance there is between the enclosure and the panel. I can't think of a good way to check this off the top of my head. You may be limited to a flush mount setup cutting into the net volume further.

Just to give you another option, Kicker has a 6.75" shallow mount that may fit. Depth is 2.75" cutout is 5.625 and min sealed volume is 0.18 cubes.
Yep, I realize those limitations. The first one I had is if the volume is even close so I'll start there.

For no particular reason, I'm just not a big kicker fan.
08-12-2019 06:52 PM
PhailosaurusRex
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

One other consideration is excursion and how much clearance there is between the enclosure and the panel. I can't think of a good way to check this off the top of my head. You may be limited to a flush mount setup cutting into the net volume further.

Just to give you another option, Kicker has a 6.75" shallow mount that may fit. Depth is 2.75" cutout is 5.625 and min sealed volume is 0.18 cubes.
08-12-2019 01:10 PM
midnightg35x
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhailosaurusRex View Post
Remove the enclose, seal the inside of the port and the mounting hole, fill it with water then measure the water. I haven't seen a volume published for it.

Personally I'd stick with a quality 6x9 due to the small volume (even before displacement) and lack of rigidity. There's also only 3" of mounting depth.
I was hoping to get a measurement before I ripped everything apart and then have to decide what to use with the panels apart, but your method will certainly work. If I do go that route, I'll report back on the volume. There certainly is a question about rigidity, but I will have to see what options I have there once I get in there. I know it is a small volume, but there are a good amount of small 6.5" subs out there that do not require much volume. Finding that actual mounting depth is a key parameter to limit my choices down. My ideal sub to put in there is a JL 6W3v3 as it only needs .15 ft^3 sealed, but the mounting depth is pretty deep at 4.25." Moving to something like the skar evl-65 drops the mouting depth to 3.5", but sealed box goes up to 0.25 ft^3. The shallowest option is the earthquake SWS 6.5X with 1.8125" mounting depth and 0.2-0.4 ft^3 sealed.

I like the dedicated sub instead of a 6x9 because I was going to completely remove the rear fill otherwise.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jrhorne View Post
For the mounting depth, i recall from many years ago when i replaced the rear 6x9 speakers that i had to cut the port/tube that protrudes into the speaker enclosure because the magnet from the aftermarket speakers was much larger than stock (e.g., aftermarket speaker was "deeper"). This was a simple fix however - i just had to cut part of the plastic tube and the new speakers cleared without a problem
I think if the volume of the enclosure is small, I would have to remove the port all together. I doubt it has the volume to support a port of any kind as ported enclosures need more volume compared to their sealed counterparts. Cutting the port changes its characteristics also, so I again would probably just go sealed unless the volume and port characteristics happen to line up with a speaker I can find.

Thanks for the input!
08-12-2019 12:35 PM
jrhorne
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

For the mounting depth, i recall from many years ago when i replaced the rear 6x9 speakers that i had to cut the port/tube that protrudes into the speaker enclosure because the magnet from the aftermarket speakers was much larger than stock (e.g., aftermarket speaker was "deeper"). This was a simple fix however - i just had to cut part of the plastic tube and the new speakers cleared without a problem
08-12-2019 03:50 AM
PhailosaurusRex
Re: Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

Remove the enclose, seal the inside of the port and the mounting hole, fill it with water then measure the water. I haven't seen a volume published for it.

Personally I'd stick with a quality 6x9 due to the small volume (even before displacement) and lack of rigidity. There's also only 3" of mounting depth.
08-11-2019 10:41 PM
midnightg35x
Rough Volume of Rear Speaker Enclosure?

I'm looking at replacing the rear 6x9's with dedicated 6.5" subs. I haven't pulled my seats apart to measure anything yet, so does anybody know the rough enclosure volume and port length/diameter? I originally wanted to look into the JL 6W3v3, but the mounting depth has me concerned. It might have to be something shallower like the Skar EVL-65. Finding the volume of the enclosure will help me narrow down my choices if it is even a good idea.

This is on a 1992 3000GT VR4. I searched around and could not find the answer.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.