![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Vr4 Addict
|
yea sorry for that !
__________________
93 green vr4
greddy type rs bov, AWS, yoko as430 tires,Newer TC, Free boost mod, UP short shifter, mushy intake, cross drilled rotors, BT ground wires, chrome ypipe (bling), royal purple everywheree on its way to being installed:msd coils and wires, ngk coppers, 99 lifters, megan coilovers, 120k service, ips short dp, aem tru boost, walbro w/hotwire+install, adj ca's, tcase bracket, aem dryflow filter, pmp fmic ![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
vice prez: TPW
|
Quote:
It is a Carbing/ PitRoad M 3 point bar. It is originally designed by Carbing but with design modifications done by Pitroad M. As the original by Carbing was supposably not a perfect fit, this one was basically a strait drop in. I bought it from Ralli Art 3000GT on the board. -John
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
The next issue is .... IF you want something that actually works, what are the alternative bars out there? Cusco is for window-dressing only, and the Carbing ....... although triangulated (firewall mounted) will do little if you believe the towers deflect in the horizontal or longitudinal planes (inward or upward). It would need a section directly across the towers for inward deflection and it sits too low (fault of how low our firewall is) to stop the deflections around the horizontal plane. Its design seems best suited to stop rearward deflection, but even then it could benefit from triangulation with a section across the towers. If any, the deflection(s) are probably in multiple planes, but does anyone know where the 3S is most vulnerable? Is there data somewhere other than SOTP data? That might help us with the decision on what is the most effective bar. Now ....... if TEC or Carbing combined the two designs, we might have something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
|
Another TEC owner (front and rear). Never had any fitment issue. The bar dropped right in the first time and I have taken it out multiple times since and never had to do much than knock it with my hand to take it out. Never noticed the bar contorting when tightening the bolts.
I also have the MAP sensor on top of the plenum on my car (99 VR-4) and didn't have any issues with it coming in contact with the bar. So that makes me wonder too whether your car is out of spec. Are you the original owner? The reason I ask is because I had an issue with a racing dynamics strut bar that wouldn't fit on an E30 M3. Turned out to be that the distance between the strut towers was out of specs because of a previous accident. another possibilty would be that the bar you got is from a defective batch or that it has been somehow damaged (bent). Also from the picture below, I see that you have mounted the bolts holding the battery tie-down backwards. The threads should be going out not in so that they don't come in contact with the strut tower. ![]() Reda/ |
|
|
|