(((Mitsubishi MUT-II/MUT-III Datalogger)))

[AudibleSilence]

Can't be run with a palm at all eh? Guess I too will buy an el cheapo laptop for it. I'm going to need this for my 97 anyways...least I won't have to change out ECU's now.

[Hannibalzero]

Originally Posted by wraith

thanks...but I was asking out of curiosity more then anything else since I run an AEM EMS right now. I have been thinking on/off about putting mine back to original condition which is why I asked.

You sound like you are thinking about selling.

[Cool Name Here]

Thank you for addressing my questions about the SRS light, but please elaborate on why this unit is superior over the HHH. I am trying to compare both, but as I stated earlier, I am new to logging and such, so forgive the ignorance.

[Agent|99VR4]

Originally Posted by Cool Name Here

Thank you for addressing my questions about the SRS light, but please elaborate on why this unit is superior over the HHH. I am trying to compare both, but as I stated earlier, I am new to logging and such, so forgive the ignorance.

If im not mistaken, From what I've gathered.

The MUT is a mitsubishi diagnostic tool that does it all (SRS) See knock counts etc. whilst, the HHH is an actual datalogger, although OBDII functions are limited.

Im really excited about this, as soon as I get a few bucks from my tax return, Ill post some more about logging with the 99!

[TiberiusTribun]

Well HHH state they can display and clear error codes too. I Just bought it because I felt It was more specialized to the 3S than the Evoscan which targets generally all Mitsubishi vehicles with MUT II / III able port.

But I just might spend the extra $25 for the Evoscan depending on my experiences with HHH. The map tracer feature might come in handy if I should ever go aftermarket or piggy back ECU.

[Let-luse]

Originally Posted by TiberiusTribun

Well HHH state they can display and clear error codes too. I Just bought it because I felt It was more specialized to the 3S than the Evoscan which targets generally all Mitsubishi vehicles with MUT II / III able port.

But I just might spend the extra $25 for the Evoscan depending on my experiences with HHH. The map tracer feature might come in handy if I should ever go aftermarket or piggy back ECU.

1st gens (OBD-I) have a lot of options to choose from when it comes to datalogging. HHH is a good choice. So is MMCD.

OBD-IIs on the other hand have limited options. The OBD-II version of HHH has a very slow data sampling rate and AFIK doesn't log knock so it's pretty useless on an OBD-II.

Evoscan has a decent data sampling rate and logs knock. Plus it can log boost, EGT and Wideband AFR since it offers the option to integrate Innovate or Zeitronix products. For us OBD-II owners, Evoscan is a blessing.

Reda/

[Hannibalzero]

Originally Posted by TiberiusTribun

Well HHH state they can display and clear error codes too.

The HHH logger will clear DTCs for the ECU. Basically, it can clear anything that triggers the Check Engine Light.

I believe the SRS codes are stored on the SRS control unit, not the ECU.

Originally Posted by Let-luse

OBD-IIs on the other hand have limited options. The OBD-II version of HHH has a very slow data sampling rate and AFIK doesn't log knock so it's pretty useless on an OBD-II.

I believe you are correct. I am fairly certain HHH does not log knock on an OBDII (96+) ECU.

Originally Posted by Let-luse

Evoscan has a decent data sampling rate and logs knock. Plus it can log boost, EGT and Wideband AFR since it offers the option to integrate Innovate or Zeitronix products. For us OBD-II owners, Evoscan is a blessing.

The guy who programmed the HHH logger said that he was going to make an update patch that allows for you to log external signals through the EGT thermistor (similar to other loggers). I'm not sure if this has happened yet though. If the patch is already available, then HHH would give you the capability to read voltage from one exernal sensor.

Also, I haven't used my HHH (hybrid) logger recently, but I thought that the software allowed several additional external fields. Of course, the question is how do you configure your laptop to accept these signals. Its not like the ECU or the logger cable have ports for external sensors. If this feature is useable in the software, it would require a hardware component to measure the voltage. Perhaps a custom serial cable can be made???

[oohnoo]

At this moment the EVOscan doesn't clear DTC's, got some error when i tried this. Not worried as I'm sure he's working on it.
Funny but while sitting at a traffic light waiting to turn so I can get my car inspected my check engine light comes on damn P505 code) So I quickly connect my other logger and clear the code and then pull into the inspection station and get the car emission inspected. PASSED........lol

[simace]

I have a question, has anyone got the Boost to read correctly? If so, how did you do it?

It seems Boost is always reading ~3-4x what I'm actually boosting.

[Prime12]

Originally Posted by simace

I have a question, has anyone got the Boost to read correctly? If so, how did you do it?

It seems Boost is always reading ~3-4x what I'm actually boosting.

Considering the car isn't actually measuring boost correctly in the first place... I really doubt it.