![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#371 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
|
PTE 550's from IPS Motorsports fuel kit...
__________________
New Project....
1991 3KGT VR-4, Follow the progress here! Mods: Rob Beck 13T's, HKS SSQV, IPS Complete Fuel kit;550cc injectors, Apexi Neo SAFC, Walbro 255, Fuel pump hotwire, MBC, K&N FPIK, Downpipe, IPS Quad tip cat-back, 99' Lifters, Tein springs, KYB-GR2's, ![]() 1996 Ford Probe GT Turbo, SOLD TONS of pics on this To4B-H3 Machine |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#372 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
|
yes I Agree this should be true... yet not only myself but others as well have complained about the ECU modifying timing due to this... The data logs tell the truth. Before and after mod logs show this..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#373 (permalink) |
|
Meet the twins
|
I'm thinking this changes the reading of baremetric pressure sensor. My theory is that with the honeycomb removed, your get faster air flow through the MAS, and thus lower pressure inside of it.......... I'm no engineer though
![]() It could also have some effect on the temperature reading, but it seems as though you would see a lower temp due to less friction with no honecomb.... Something I've been thinking about is there are resistors that you can install in your MAS to fool the ECU into thinking the intake charge it cooler so it advances the timing and adds fuel. Maybe it would be possible to install a resistor that would fool the ECU into seeing a warmer charge, and thus take timing out............... Last edited by maddux317 : 02-10-2008 at 09:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#374 (permalink) |
|
est. sept, 2000
|
thanks for that insight but this thread is concerning the stock MAF.
__________________
97 VR4 12.417@111.16 9b time. whats next?
95 mark viii. 14.35@98 03 cobra vert. 4 mods=118mph traps 91 stealth TT. td05 18G, heads/cams, 3000lbs ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#375 (permalink) |
|
broke joke
|
Quite a read. I have stock fuel. If i remove all honeycombs would i need fuel correction?
__________________
92' firestorm VR-4 - complete 96' JDM drivetrain - 92' electronics/sensors - UR cam gears, flywheel - DNP pipes - Stillen intake, rotors - 3sx downpipe, steel braided lines, subframe/diff bushings, control arms, plennum spacer - Tein s - denso IK24 - Apex'i AVC-r - MP solid mounts - Spec 3 - Vacc reduction
Deleted - ALL emissions, AA, antenna, rear wiper, front washer bottle, batt relocate, 4WS |
|
|
|
|
|
#376 (permalink) |
|
Norcal3S.com
|
I have been running zero honeycombs in my car for about 2 months with no problems what so ever. my 13t's are set at 15psi right now. pump 91 octane. zero problems. so far this mod seems very promising!
__________________
![]() 13T's + Supporting Mods|DSM SMIC's|K-Sport Coilovers|Battery in Trunk Alchy Injection|Saner Sway Bars|Bronze 17x9 FN01R-C's|3" Straight Pipes 1992 VR-4: My Weekend Warrior ![]() 1996 Grand Cherokee: My DD, 4" Lift and 31" Tires ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#377 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
I am at +13 with my neo in the idle area to get them to cycle with all side honeycombs removed.
__________________
His - Red 93 RT/tt
Mods: Hallman's MBC @ 16 psi psi, turbo XS type H BOV, stillen dp, custom exhaust, Spec stage 2 clutch, RPS FW, 3sx lightweight crank pulley, BCP7RES-11 @ .030 gap, autometer gauges, slightly gutted mas, dsm SMIC's, ACPT 1 piece CFDS, Tein S springs, pte 580 inj's, safc neo/SITC, 13t's, hotwired walbro, maximal performance solid motor mounts, DR plenum spacer. Hers - BPU Green 94 vr4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378 (permalink) |
|
broke joke
|
W/ the middle one left intact one would need to richen it up because its not registering the extra air. W/ the middle one out and the rest in, one would need to lean it up.. I would think w/ all honeycombs removed one wouldn't need to richen it up because the ports would have 'equal' resistance. Seems logical..
I'll try this when i get my datalogger working again. It seems like the only difference between this and adding an open element filter would be more turbulence at the sensor.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#380 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
|
please correct me if im wrong, and i apologize if this was mentioned already, i did a quick search of the thread and didnt see much.
but wouldnt a similar result be achieved by lowering the base fuel pressure? i assume the power gain has a lot to do with getting the IDC's closer to optimal, but in this case you are chaning the amount of air that is metered as apposed to chaning the amount of fuel that it demanded. similarly, couldnt you lower to base fuel pressure so you could get the IDC's closer to 85% or what ever?
__________________
![]() Want to Buy:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|