![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#211 (permalink) | |
|
Blowing hot air
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Broadway Auto Clinic..Home of Big Dicks Performance
Rick@broadwayautoclinic.com 518-434-4077 http://www.BroadwayAutoClinic.com http://www.BigBoysFastToys.com 19T turbos from Blouch Turbo**DR Stage Three Heads** Pauter connecting rods**Wiseco Forged Pistons**New OE forged crank** Nissan connecting rod bearings**32X15X3.5 FMIC and 2.5" hardpipes**TANABE SUPER MEDALION RACING HYPER exhaust**custom downpipe**ACPT 1 piece drive shaft** RPS Stage Three Clutch** Emange Blue and EO1 piggyback** Koyo 2" aluminum radiator**Denso 660 injectors** Greddy 60MM gauges in every flavor**FJO wideband**Dawes Twin AF gages**water cooled oil cooler** H&R lowering springs and ne OE struts**5Ziggen 18X8.5 FN1OC Gunmetal wheels**Goodyear F1 tires**etc,etc |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#212 (permalink) |
|
05 GTO
|
It sounds to me like you may be too rich or too lean
Well considering I tried settings from -5% (with fuel spitting outta the exhaust, rich as hell) all the way to -25% I think I pretty much covered running either to rich, lean, or in between. Over 3K with settings -20 reaching -26 to redline the car pulls real hard, but anything under 3K is crap acceleration, and driveability. This mod just looks like it's not gonna work for me, oh well at least it was reversible and I tried it out.
__________________
-2005 Pontiac GTO-
Silver/Red M6 Former 95 VR4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 (permalink) |
|
Blowing hot air
|
Odd.
I have the same year car and similar mods to yours. The biggest difference between us is the IC's. I see no reason why it wouldn't work on yours perfectly. I've done this to another 95 (AllEyesOnMyVR4) and his runs the same way mine does, as far as having no dead spots.. He has stock ICs. I noticed that your fuel correction unit is an HKS. I wonder if that has anything to do with it |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
Wher your at 3,6k and -17 i´m at -28 and your 4,2k and -18 i´m at -29 and i´m still running rich as hell.... Why does my car run rich with my numbers?
__________________
Crazy mitzu owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 (permalink) | |
|
"The Unfair Advantage"
|
Quote:
On for the high settings. I started out by adding 10% more fuel accross the board to be safe. Turns out, it was damn close to being perfect. As of now, I have it about 10-12% richer across the band than before, but its still a little lean for my tastes. I had to stop making passes when my brakes started to smell and stopped working.... Anyway, I got a log, 2k to redline, 02's start at .92, then go into .94 all the way to about 6500 rpm, where it goes .96. No knock, with 1.1 bar. (higher than my first log) BUT, the timing is still crazy high. (I'll post a log pic soon) It still gets into the upper 30's. So, in conclusion, it took me about 45 min to change the MAF, tune the idle, then tune the high settings by making about 5 passes in 2nd gear. I still don't know about a 3rd gear run, it might be a tad lean yet. Its not like my VPC, but I like it. Throttle response is 100% normal, the car goes into closed loop just fine. Pretty much the car is EXACTLY the way it used to be, only it spools quicker, pulls a little harder, and holds a little more boost to redline. I'll be doing this mod to my friend's VR4. (Adler's old car) Pros: *easy and fast mod *spooled quicker *pulled slightly harder *held a little more boost to redline *using about 10-15% less of my S-AFC Cons: *didn't solve my timing mystery
__________________
'96 240SX SE - 12.5@ 113mph stock turbo, street tires
S14SR -330whp GT3567R @ 17psi 100% stock motor www.boostedvr4.com ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 (permalink) | |
|
vehicular thaumaturgist
|
Quote:
-Chris
__________________
The Pansy Patrol - a 3000GT/Stealth car blog with how-tos
![]() Pearl Yellow 1994 R/T TT w/84k - FOR SALE! new 4-Bolt factory short block, DR StgII heads, Titan TD05 headers, 14B turbos w/ ported 7cm^2 housings, 3" minimum-bend catless exhaust, SCE oil pan, RPSII clutch, Fidenza flywheel, OZ F1 Plus 17x9.5" wheels, Kumho Ecsta MX 245/45 tires, Drweldin DSM SMICs, 3SX engine mounts (Maximal solid front), GReddy 60mm P/H/W boost, Carbotech Panther Plus & Bobcat pads w/ slotted/drilled rotors, KSport GT-Pro coilovers, Maximal rear camber arms, SCE balljoints, ABS delete w/ cockpit-mounted Wilwood proportioning valve, AC delete, EGR/evap/dashpot delete, cruise/vacuum-tank delete, '95 Lexan headlights, McCulloch 4300K HIDs, GReddy Type-S BOV, solid shift bushings; Misc Parts: Walbro341, 20# fixed-back seats, Accelerated Moto catch can |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 (permalink) |
|
Verified Seller
|
When I review my runs with the pocketlogger, my timing is in the 20's. When I review the same log on the PL Viewer (on the PC), they are in the 30's. I don't know why they don't offer the "Stealth timing correction" on the PL Viewer. When people are reporting their timing what are they using as reference?
Also, my timing drop of -1 is generally between 3000->5500 rpms. After 5500 rpms they start to go back up again. I'm guessing this is because the ECU already knows torque falls off at around 5152 rpms and believes it needs to advance timing. Generally the ECU advances timing during lighter loads. Incidently, last night I discovered a major boost leak that has been with my car ever since I installed 15G turbos. With that leak fixed, my car just roars after 5000rpms now.. wo ho! This probably explains why I'm running so rich up top. I'll have to do some more tuning again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 (permalink) | |
|
Blowing hot air
|
Quote:
perhaps the second gen optic sensor reacts a bit differently? How would making more power solve the problem BTW? This mod does achieve that, but timing that is too advanced is timing that is too advanced. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#220 (permalink) | |
|
vehicular thaumaturgist
|
Quote:
If you add injectors that are 50% larger than stock (compensating with the AFC), then proceed to make 50% more power than stock, the ECU has no idea that there was any change at all. Now with 50% larger injectors (550cc/min), you do not compensate with the AFC downwards 50% -- you compensate downwards somewhere around 34.54%. In other words the ECU will see: (100% - 34.54%) = 65.46% of the airflow going into the engine. However, 50% more airflow (or 150% of 65.46%) equals approximately 100%, so the ECU will see the same airflow as before the injectors, and will actually be delivering 50% more fuel to the 50% more air coming in. Hope that is a relatively clear explaination. -Chris |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|