3000GT/Stealth International 3000GT/Stealth International
 

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors

Go Back   3000GT/Stealth International Message Center > Modifications and Technical Support > Advanced Technical Discussions
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

3si.org is the premier 3000GT/Stealth International Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2007, 04:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Mike Vincent
 
Mike00804's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cumberland, RI
Drives: A 1991 4 bolt VR-4
Trader Rating: (4)
Mike00804 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

What's up everyone, (also posted in ENGINE Turbo)
I'm in the middle of building a 4 bolt motor to replace my 2 bolt. I have 15G turbos, Pauter Rods, brand new oem crank, ARP head and main studs, Ross Pistons, Torque plated machine work, some head work, Aluminum flywheel, aluminum crank pully, AEM wideband, AVC-R, S-AFC, Walbro pump, and some other stuff......
Here's the question. The machine shop just received the pistons from Ross, but he got flat topped 9:1 ratio pistons. I was pretty upset when I saw that they weren't 8:1. I want to know if anyone has a 9:1 ratio in their VR-4,(saw one kid here, but it was a FWD TT conversion and he only has 9B's and everything fuel is stock) and if you ran into any tuning problems. I'm planning on running 15-18 psi with the 15G's and don't want to have to run race fuel all the time. Any past experiences welcome. Basicly, I want the most power on pump gas, and any extra I'll tune for with a race fuel map. I don't want to need race fuel for anything over 12psi...you know. Any and all help will be appreciated as I need to make an immediate decision if I plan on driving the car this spring.

Thanks in advance,
-Mike Vincent
91 VR-4 Rhode Island
Mike00804 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 03-20-2007, 09:44 AM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Can Na Daa
Trader Rating: (4)
BlackFastRT is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Don't be concerned so much with the PSI you want to run, if your running higher compression you'll make more power with lower boost. However your potential may be limited.
BlackFastRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 12:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Not here for the tuna.
 
lawdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, VT
Drives: junk
Trader Rating: (81)
lawdogg Level 2lawdogg Level 2lawdogg Level 2lawdogg Level 2lawdogg Level 2lawdogg Level 2
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Me and Kiwbe gave you some good info in the other thread.
__________________
R.I.P.
lawdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 03:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tomball,Tx
Drives: 92 RT-TT
Trader Rating: (45)
markoverclock is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

http://www.3si.org/forum/showthread....&page=19&pp=10

look at post #183

i did some 19t's for him and he had a 9 to 1 engine. and was very happy.
markoverclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 10:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
SOHC you in the FACE
 
Ondontii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle and SaltLake
Drives: Mrs. Officer
Trader Rating: (0)
Ondontii Level 1Ondontii Level 1
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackFastRT
Don't be concerned so much with the PSI you want to run, if your running higher compression you'll make more power with lower boost. However your potential may be limited.
He wants the "most" power out of pump gas not "good power"
__________________
Brent - Great Depression Racing
1992 Duster 11.54@125 22psi BONE Stock 6g72 12 valve - 12.7@114 14psi boost -516whp 519ft/lb 20psi (Old 3.13L built shortblock) - Precision 6765, Tial 38mm open dump, 3" open downpipe, 20x12x3" evo style intercooler, Stock 10:1 diamante 12 valve shortblock with regapped rings. heavily ported heads (+40% on flowbench), Ferrea Competition Plus +2 +1 stainless valves, Nielson Vintage Racing 278 custom turbo cams, RPW cam gears, Custom Ram Style short runner intake manifold, 12 Gal Jaz Fuel Cell, Dual external Walbro GSL392 255HPs, Dual 5/16" feed lines, Trick Flow AFPR, 3 puck solid hub & 3300# DD plate, OBX Torsional Diff, Zeitronix wideband/EGT/Boost, 2100cc 3 nozzle DevilsOwn Meth. Running on 4.0 BAR Megasquirt II, 47# Inj, E70 Fuel
1994 Spirit - 13.987@101.89 - 5psi- 6g72 SOHC, K27 Turbo

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...-on_649313.htm
Ondontii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 11:48 PM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tomball,Tx
Drives: 92 RT-TT
Trader Rating: (45)
markoverclock is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

z06 is a 11to1 engine and has a tt kit for it. they only run like 6psi. because that is all they really need. higher compression is more hp, so you go and add boost and now you have even more hp. must run high test gas, and watch closely for knock is the downside. you wont need as much boost is what im saying to make xxx amount of power.
markoverclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 11:03 AM   #7 (permalink)
Verified Seller
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (28)
Agent|99VR4 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Quote:
Originally Posted by markoverclock
http://www.3si.org/forum/showthread....&page=19&pp=10

look at post #183

i did some 19t's for him and he had a 9 to 1 engine. and was very happy.
Hey mike sorry to hear, I agree though. More power with less boost and it shouldn't be as bad as the FWD's with their 10:1's.

Besides your all built up, and knock, although bad, shouldn't hurt the internals as much as it would a stock block :P

GL man, I'm chugging along with my rebuild! Thank Tony for me will yah, hes bring it down on the 29th :P
__________________
Still doing the poly type mounts!
99 VR-4 Back to Life: Here

------------Family of 2 99 VR-4's----------
#185 of 287 R71
#189 of 287 W75 n-->
Agent|99VR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 12:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Kibwe Walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nashville
Drives: 93 RT/tt
Trader Rating: (5)
Kibwe Walker Level 1Kibwe Walker Level 1
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent|99VR4
More power with less boost and it shouldn't be as bad as the FWD's with their 10:1's.

Besides your all built up, and knock, although bad, shouldn't hurt the internals as much as it would a stock block :P

GL man, I'm chugging along with my rebuild! Thank Tony for me will yah, hes bring it down on the 29th :P


To a point. Higher overall compression increases the efficiency of combustion but ultimately you make more power from more air and fuel.

So a more correct statement would be more power with equal boost, but still if you have 8:1 and are running 18 psi with it, you will make more power than if you had a 9:1 running 15 or less.

That extra 3 psi forces that much more air/fuel into your combustion chamber. The most powerful setups are the ones that get away with the most boost and that isn't just this platform, thats all platforms. Whoever gets the most air/fuel in, can make the most power from said air/fuel.

One of those golden rules which most everything is based off: Energy can neither be created or destroyed, merely transfered.

The energy that ends up on a dyno or moves you down the road comes from COMBUSTION, in your internal combustion engine. You want more power is basically saying you need more energy, which means you need to complete more combustion by adding more air and fuel.
__________________
Red 93 RT/tt project car
Mods: stillen dp, custom exhaust, Spec stage 2 clutch, RPS FW, 3sx lightweight crank pulley, BCP7RES-11 @ .030 gap, autometer gauges, dsm SMIC's, Tein S springs, pte 580 inj's, hotwired walbro, maximal performance solid motor mounts, DR plenum spacer.

94 vr4: RIP 4/16/09

Kibwe Walker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 08:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
resident evil
 
wraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oradell New Jersey
Trader Rating: (16)
wraith Level 2wraith Level 2wraith Level 2wraith Level 2wraith Level 2wraith Level 2
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

Quote:
Originally Posted by markoverclock
z06 is a 11to1 engine and has a tt kit for it. they only run like 6psi. because that is all they really need. higher compression is more hp, so you go and add boost and now you have even more hp. must run high test gas, and watch closely for knock is the downside. you wont need as much boost is what im saying to make xxx amount of power.
APS, the company that made the turbo kit for my GTO also made one for the new Z06. Its true they made about 650rwhp on around 5psi, but the engine already made 450rwhp stock, and the heads are basically C5-R racing heads which are much better flowing heads then out 3S heads and the car would have made 800rwhp easily on pump gas had the compression been around 9:1. With our cars, with TD04s, if your running 8:1 your lucky to get 400awhp on pump gas but at 9:1 you will probably make that 400awhp on a little less boost but your going to have to be a little more careful tuning it.
wraith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 12:55 AM   #10 (permalink)
New User - Please be kind
 
BI Sales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Dakota
Drives: car 3mo of the year
Trader Rating: (1)
BI Sales is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 9:1 compression ratio VR-4 ??GOOD/BAD??

I was smiling until I read the part about tuning on an afc, then my butthole puckered.
BI Sales is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  3000GT/Stealth International Message Center > Modifications and Technical Support > Advanced Technical Discussions


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2