![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Play that Funky Music
|
Quote:
The only part in the engine that needs to be "broken in" on a fresh engine are the rings. Once they are seated it is broken in and can be pushed as hard as you wish {given the builds ability and tuning} Personally I break in engines hard and have never had a ring seat issue. But that is controversial. Rod bearings fail for many reasons. Oil contamination Lack of oil/heat Detonation Improper engine build (replacing bearings on a spun journal without getting journal fixed, improper turning of crank after spinning bearing and other bad building techniques such as improper specs, non use of assembly lube etc)
__________________
AEM Factory Trained Tuner
T4 AWD 9.21 @ 154.98 T2 FWD 10.19 @ 140.31 T4-159.23 MPH Ran on 6G72 3.1L! T4-995AWHP Uncorrected 6G72 3.0L 91VR4 Red-17Gs w/supporting mods-sold 93SLTT/T2 91VR4 Pearl White-sold 91VR4 Black-sold 92VR4 Sandstone-sold 94VR4 Green-sold 93VR4 Pearl White-sold 91VR4 Black-5027s-3.0L-Stock heads and Cams- 614AWHP 557AWTQ uncorrected 24psi Daily Driver 3SX Performance 3SX Performance Service Email |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
|
I would venture to say the car saw nothing over 4k rpm or 6 psi in the first 2500 miles. Broken in yes, but back to the bearings, you see we have strengthened rods, pistons, etc, but bearings is there a way to strengthen them, is there a custom brand out there that can be used. I've have about 4 of these cars myself, and my entire time working on my own and others, I've never seen a broken or warped piston or rod, its always the freakin bearings. I'm really looking into the grooms shortblock as it comes with a lifetime warranty. And they do something with the oil passages in the engine as well to help out with the oiling issues our engines have. Just need more info on exactly what they do and if it does what it is supposed to do.
__________________
1998 VR4: SS Downpipe, Borla Cat-Back, Open Element Air Filter, ACPT CFDS, DN Intake Pipes, Front & Rear Strut Tower Bars, Deftracing 575 Hood, Blitz DSBC, Vacum Redution, Krank Vents, KOYO Aluminum Radiator
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Play that Funky Music
|
Personally these are my opinions. Take them for what they are worth. Others may have their own.
It's not the bearings. They are not failing due to the construction/material. It's the size of the bearings. Look at DSM rod bearings. Look at the 3.5L rod bearings. The 6G72's biggest weak point imo is the small size of the bearing. Smaller size means less area for load bearing. Throw in FI and it only gets worse. Now, on T4, we have never spun a bearing, or even pounded one flat {rod or main}. This past season we haven't even seen wear on mains or rods enough to show appreciable copper. Now, this may be due to using new OEM crank, oil pump, perfectly spec'd build using clevitte bearings with plenty assembly lube. Proper pre lube before startups, good tune etc. But bearings just are not an issue on T4 and she arguably is one of the most powerful 3S's here, and probably the most powerful bar none 3.0-3.1 here. So it's not power that is killing bearings. Maybe, and this is total conjecture on my part, the use of certain rods and pistons take a certain amount of shock away from the bearing load? Not sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Fool...No man can kill me
|
Dont you guys have Pauter rods in T4? They are pretty much the heaviest rod on the market for our cars arent they?
I attribute most engine failures to poor builds, even a decent build will last a little while, but if its not perfect, eventually it will go. Be it 5k miles or 20k miles it will eventually let go. Jason
__________________
"Busting your butt doesn't guarantee success but sitting on your butt will pretty much guarantee failure"
![]() Quality parts and service from I.P.S. And yeah, ^^^ is a real one... 2001 Silver Dodge Ram/Cummins diesel - tow vehicle for ^^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Cant get there from here!
|
Lots of opinions and theories but there should be a REAL reason for this, but yet no-one has come up with one.
Initial failure cant be blamed on debris, and could be when it happened a second time, but all the posts I've seen claim to have flushed engine components thoroughly. THEN there is the fact that all the bottom end components are very robust. I put my NA motor back together with used parts and new bearings and it works wonderfully and I'm well past the typical 5k re-blowup time. BTW- My motor failed from some goober who didnt understand that rod bolts needed to be torqued. I found the missing nut AND rob bolt un-damaged in the pan! Recently I was talking to a motorcycle racer friend about a bike that had a penchant for trashing rods and heads and he revealed that the motors were bolted into the frame in a stressed condition. (frame and motor dimensions werent the same and fasteners clamped them together!) When the motor mount points were shimmed the problems went away. Any chance of a connection that way that some stress on the blocks from movement (or lack of it on solid mounts) may be the culprit. Others have also blamed replacement crank pulleys without rubber damping as causing harmonics to destroy engines yet there are many that have many miles on them with no problem. Is it time to create a database of failures to learn whats really going on? WE have learned to obey the 60k/120k routine to make sure timing components dont fail. Maybe there is something to be learned here for the survival of rod bearings. -SP
__________________
![]() One of 789 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
|
Quote:
Patryn- what grade of oil are you using? Did you REPLACE the oil cooler? Do you allow the car ample time to warm up before you run it hard? It takes oil a bit longer to reach operating temp than coolant. I'm with IPO on the break in, rings are the only thing you break in. Everything else in theory never touches so how can it break in?
__________________
~Ryan
92 Stealth R/T TT- Not exactly done 93 Stealth R/T TT- I might make it run eventually Last edited by MustGoFaster : 01-01-2008 at 09:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Fool...No man can kill me
|
Thanks for correcting me, just another thing ive heard so many times on here
FWIW: i had pauters in my last car. Jason Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Verified Seller
|
I know this is going against what others have said on this forum for years, but the rod bearing failures still don't go away. Rod bearing failure in these engines have nothing to do with the rod, bearing, or the quality of the build. It's not a clearance problem, out of round journal, finish of the journal, oil pump that keeps being changed without results. These engines have alot of oil in suspension. 24 oil squirters for the rockers, 10 cam journals, 12 piston oilers, mains, and the last in the chain to be oiled the rods, so their the first to starve for oil. If there were a problem with the build you would know it immediatly. I had 120,000 miles on my motor before it spun #3 rod bearing, so that wasn't caused by a build problem. The engine starved for oil. I have modified several FL3S members oil pans to add 1 1/2 qts of capacity to the stock oil pan. I have 20,000 miles on my build since rebuilding the engine without any problems. Going to a thicker oil makes the problem worse, it takes longer to return to the sump. I offered this service for $250 dollars, most thought it would be cheaper to take their chances. Some people have spun bearings on more than one engine, because they have'nt changed their approach to the problem. If you have a new bottom end with tight clearances,you shouldn't use an oil thicker than 10w30, even thinner would be better. Another thing that has been missed is that the oil is also used as a coolant to carry away the heat. If the oil is too thick, enough won't flow to keep the parts separated and cool. You will have high oil press, but it's not going where needed, just recirculating in the pump.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
boosted
|
Quote:
__________________
1991 Dodge Stealth R/T TT
12.427@112.91 w/1.830 60' @ 8900' 3968lbs race weight 13T's |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|