Old setup on pump was 440awhp @ 18psi
Heads and Cams dude.
that's cool, but currently the way the dyno charts are setup, it only shows the best entry for each turbo, regardless of fuel used.
and well, yeah. obviously heads and cams are practically a necessity. but there have been several heads/cams td04 cars in years past that haven't broken 500 awhp on race gas, let alone pump. i was more interested in any tuning "tweaks" that you knew of.
__________________
Dyno Collection Thread
1993 Dodge Stealth ES, White, April 2002 - April 2005, SOLD 1 of 53
1993 Dodge Stealth TT, Black, Since April 2004, 1 of 5 ever mademore rarity info
2003 Subaru Forester 2.5X, Blue, Sept. 2005, Daily Driver with 165 HP of Fury! At least it's AWD. 305 awhp, 325 awtq(BPU minus full catback exhaust)Mods at that time
13.02@104.67 (9bs, dp, fipk, 15.5 psi, bov, no cats, streetmax clutch, 1.77 60', decent conditions, full weight (even spare tire/jack)
13.09@105.08 (1.80 60', same conditions as above)
Beyond BPU: (meaning upgraded turbos/fuel/etc) before engine rebuild Mods at that time
12.38@113.00(20 psi, 110 octane, massive knock above 6k rpms)
12.41@115.10(ditto)
After Rebuild (by IPS): Current ModsDyno Tune by IPS
12.8@108 (12.5 psi dropping to ~11 @redline, 2.0 60', pump gas, my tune)
Just noticed T4's HP by Trap speed isn't on the chart.
159.23 MPH
2950 raceweight
i think a while back we had a brief discussion about this. i couldn't find anywhere that you ever posted a measured weight for T4, all that was ever posted up was an estimated weight. so did you actually weigh it on a scale? or is this the estimated? if it's by scale i'll gladly update the charts.
i think a while back we had a brief discussion about this. i couldn't find anywhere that you ever posted a measured weight for T4, all that was ever posted up was an estimated weight. so did you actually weigh it on a scale? or is this the estimated? if it's by scale i'll gladly update the charts.
yep, weighed at NG, both T2 and T4, they were almost dead even LOL
yep, weighed at NG, both T2 and T4, they were almost dead even LOL
this was ng07? why didn't you mention it in november when i asked then, lol. did you change anything on the car between ng07 and your 159 run in november (that would at least change the weight by more than a couple pounds)? sounds like it was weighed at 2950 at ng07, and then you guestimated 3050 in november. just help me understand what all went on there, and what changed and when it changed. i want to add you to the chart, but i don't want to accept guesstimated weights either.
ok, so this is something i've been meaning to do for a while with the 3sx car, but i haven't had the time to log on much lately. and with DR doing what he just did, it motivated me to do this.
so having just realized that the two fastest cars weren't on the "hp estimate" chart, i've decided to do a little something about it. it seems neither really has a 100% accurate weight for their car for the exact setup they ran, but each has a fairly close estimate. I won't add it to the chart, but i'll put the numbers here in this post.
3SX, 159.53, 3050 lbs (estimated in the original thread), the "estimated awhp" would be 913. i'm not sure if this is before or after their 995 awhp dyno. i tried to go back and look, but they were doing a lot of dyno's at the time with varying 9xx numbers, but the 995 is in Chris's sig. if someone wants to 100% clarify this info, i'll update this post.
DR, 166.79, 2920 lbs (maybe add a couple pounds, from original thread), the "estimated awhp" would be 1005. this was a couple weeks after his 955 awhp dyno.
so like i said, i won't add these to the chart on the front page because the weights are *somewhat* in question and it wouldn't be fair to those on the chart who did weigh them, but i felt that the numbers should be made known so that everyone can see how the cars compare when put to the same criteria, which is the point behind the chart in the first place.
is this a trap and weight that could be added to the chart? as in the car was weighed with the same setup that trap was run with? or is it an estimated weight or something else? is this your car? what setup?
is this a trap and weight that could be added to the chart? as in the car was weighed with the same setup that trap was run with? or is it an estimated weight or something else? is this your car? what setup?
at any rate, the number would be 701.
That was my car. Trap/et were very close, I would say 2 days apart. Car might have been a bit heavier, but we are talking 2-3 gallons of gas max.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
Re: Dyno Chart Collection Thread, Take Two
w/DBB DR1000's
