good to see it live on, sorry I've gotten too busy with my new business. One suggestion: move the names in the legend so they are in order with the results.
better results = name up top, it makes it easier to find them at a glance.
good to see it live on, sorry I've gotten too busy with my new business. One suggestion: move the names in the legend so they are in order with the results.
better results = name up top, it makes it easier to find them at a glance.
thanks for getting this whole ball rolling in the first place!
noted, and corrected. i just spent several hours getting it done yesterday (putting off some other things i probably should have done) to just get the info on there and get the thread started, that i just wanted to get this going, so i posted it without getting every little detail first.
this reminds me to speak to about the spool, awhp estimate, and accel charts. basically, anyone who has contributed anything to them as been added. but they're starting to get crowded, especially the awhp chart. after adding the newer updates, i had to enlarge the chart just so i could get the entire legend on there, otherwise the bottom handful of names would have been cut-off and not visible. this leads me to want to start treating them like the dyno charts, only the best from each setup/turbo would be put on there. but this also seems like it would defeat some of the purpose of the chart. this is a way to get a better feel for what they typical, not always best, performance for a given turbo is capable of. more data points, so to speak. but then there are some (and i hate to pick on you trevor because you do contribute a lot of good info) that have contributed 4 times on the same turbo setup, albeit two on pump and two on race gas, but are they really all necessary? at any rate, i'd really like to hear what you guys think about it. trim the charts, or let everyone stay and be added, or something in between?
also, i'd like to start seperate pump gas only charts. but i'm not sure i have enough info to justify the effort for those right now. if there was more contributed, maybe i could start them.
as always, comments are welcome, and new info to add as well
__________________
Dyno Collection Thread
1993 Dodge Stealth ES, White, April 2002 - April 2005, SOLD 1 of 53
1993 Dodge Stealth TT, Black, Since April 2004, 1 of 5 ever mademore rarity info
2003 Subaru Forester 2.5X, Blue, Sept. 2005, Daily Driver with 165 HP of Fury! At least it's AWD. 305 awhp, 325 awtq(BPU minus full catback exhaust)Mods at that time
13.02@104.67 (9bs, dp, fipk, 15.5 psi, bov, no cats, streetmax clutch, 1.77 60', decent conditions, full weight (even spare tire/jack)
13.09@105.08 (1.80 60', same conditions as above)
Beyond BPU: (meaning upgraded turbos/fuel/etc) before engine rebuild Mods at that time
12.38@113.00(20 psi, 110 octane, massive knock above 6k rpms)
12.41@115.10(ditto)
After Rebuild (by IPS): Current ModsDyno Tune by IPS
12.8@108 (12.5 psi dropping to ~11 @redline, 2.0 60', pump gas, my tune)
thanks for getting this whole ball rolling in the first place!
noted, and corrected. i just spent several hours getting it done yesterday (putting off some other things i probably should have done) to just get the info on there and get the thread started, that i just wanted to get this going, so i posted it without getting every little detail first.
added. your 14B was already on the chart though.
this reminds me to speak to about the spool, awhp estimate, and accel charts. basically, anyone who has contributed anything to them as been added. but they're starting to get crowded, especially the awhp chart. after adding the newer updates, i had to enlarge the chart just so i could get the entire legend on there, otherwise the bottom handful of names would have been cut-off and not visible. this leads me to want to start treating them like the dyno charts, only the best from each setup/turbo would be put on there. but this also seems like it would defeat some of the purpose of the chart. this is a way to get a better feel for what they typical, not always best, performance for a given turbo is capable of. more data points, so to speak. but then there are some (and i hate to pick on you trevor because you do contribute a lot of good info) that have contributed 4 times on the same turbo setup, albeit two on pump and two on race gas, but are they really all necessary? at any rate, i'd really like to hear what you guys think about it. trim the charts, or let everyone stay and be added, or something in between?
also, i'd like to start seperate pump gas only charts. but i'm not sure i have enough info to justify the effort for those right now. if there was more contributed, maybe i could start them.
as always, comments are welcome, and new info to add as well
Best of the best.
My opinion is that if you are too stupid to realize that not every car will make that power based on elevation, temps, general health of the motor, etc etc. Then there is no point in wasting space just for you.
Put the best that a particular setup has ever made on the STOCK engine because that gives a bolt on point of view. I feel things like cams, and heads alter the engines output no matter what turbo is on there so they should have their own dyno seperate from the others. For example there should be a stock evo3 dyno/estimates and then a evo 3 with stage 3 heads and cams.
Same turbo but drastic difference in power output. If you didn't do it this way all the setups that have heads, and cams would eventually overrun all the graphs. Worse yet a noob would come along and think they can just bolt on X or Y turbos and make similiar power when the setups on the charts are more than just a stock engine. You could add nitrous to that seperate category aswell because of how it effects turbocharged engines.
__________________
Red 93 RT/tt project car
Mods: stillen dp, custom exhaust, Spec stage 2 clutch, RPS FW, 3sx lightweight crank pulley, BCP7RES-11 @ .030 gap, autometer gauges, dsm SMIC's, Tein S springs, pte 580 inj's, hotwired walbro, maximal performance solid motor mounts, DR plenum spacer.
i do try to put significant mods in the legend (such as heads, nitrous), but there is really only so much room. this is one reason i want to start adding a link to the original post with the dyno sheet in the 2nd post. often times the actual mod list is posted along with the sheet.
the main reason keeping me from elminating all but the best of the best on the estimated awhp chart is because that's basically what the dyno charts are. the best of the best. and having a different number from those, and being estimated at that, would be kinda dumb in my opinion.
I don't see myself on the chart, so here is my contribution...
This was at 20psi...
Turbo:
Dynamic Racing DR-800 turbo kit
Tail Wastegates
Tial Blow off valve
Alamo Down Pipe
Greddy exhaust
Custom intakes with HKS Air Filters
Engine:
ROSS Pistons
Fidanza Adjustable Cam Gears
Power Enterprise Super Strong Timing Belt
Unorthodux Underdrive pulley
Krank Vent check (PCV) Valve
Polyurethane Motor Mounts
Fuel:
Greddy 720cc Injectors
Steel Braided fuel lines and loop
Supra fuel pump
SX high flow fuel filter
Electronics:
MICROTEC Engine Management System
MSD Ignition Wires
Custom Ground Wires
Greddy Profec B - Boost Controller
Innovate Wideband O2
Greddy Gauges :
EGT
Boost
Fuel Pressure
Greddy Turbo Timer
OPTIMA Red top battery
boricua, that's sweet. thanks for contributing, but unfortunately it doesn't best the dr-800 dyno already on the front page. sorry.
was this pump gas? maybe it will be added if i ever make a different pump gas chart.
hey, weren't you the guy testing out the clutchmaster twin disk? how's that going by the way?
edit: also just realized that your chart is in mph instead of rpm. i'm sorry but only charts in rpm will be added. getting exact tire circumference, etc is just too much to ask to get an accurate relation between speed and rpm on each individual's car.
This was on C-16... I know it is not much, it was at 20psi haven't some issues holding boost due to a nasty head lift..!!
Anyway, yes I just finish breaking in the clutchmasters twin disc clutch. It just smooth out the lunch from the stop at a red light... now it feels just like stock, but with a serious kick when you do a hi rpm shift. I'm still babying the car, and I think I will have to change the head gasket...
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.