Camaro offically revealed

[clculver]

i personally like the look of the interior. especially when the gauges and interior are lit up, man it looks awesome. hoping my dad picks up one of these when they come out..

[Robs99VR4]

Originally Posted by mikes2nd

2010CamaroSpecifications4.jpg


v6 hp is 260 and 300 hp version

400-425 for the v8 ss(40k).

I bet it runs circles around the challenger. Just like GM always beats Mopar...

Lets not forget about the convertable



the interior mimics the original also

Now thats just funny. I think you are confusing Mopar with Ford. lol

[Default]

Originally Posted by clculver

i personally like the look of the interior. especially when the gauges and interior are lit up, man it looks awesome. hoping my dad picks up one of these when they come out..

I'm with him, i think this lighting is terrible in these photos. Also I like how it's looks makes it seem to be smaller than the challenger. I love the exterior looks nothing i'd change there other than the chrome on the taillights, for the interior, these are some crappy shots not really showing off its attributes. I think the interior would look much better in person especially with the lighting that its supposed to have. Last of all I'm really surprised they have a 300hp NA v6 that gets 26 mpg, pretty impressive!...

Now that you guys brought up challengers. A guy that works w/ my dad bought a new challenger. He brought it over to show off since i was giving everyone so much hype about it.

Here's what i thought...it is Enormous. Definately not my cup of tea any more. it felt like a Chrysler 300C with just a little bit extra, and for 420+ hp it seemed to move like a whale. BUT!, With all the power, it could pull off a small burnout pretty easily. Overall it was a cool car, looked great from far away, but the closer i got to it, the more and more i disliked the looks. BTW if you like the looks of the carbon fiber on its hood, in person i think it looks like crap, it looks like its an overlay decal.

Just my .02

[Lord Warlock]

somehow it doesn't appear quite as sleek as the concept did. Not bad overall, but not as close to the 68-69 camaro as it did before. I'm not worried about the 400hp figure, as the GTO had similar hp ratings and it had problems getting into the low 13s, and as long as my aging cobra can beat the newer, more expensive car, who cares.

LW

[inperfectdarkness]

cars just keep getting heavier and heavier.

i'm up for an ls3>kia rio swap. WHO'S WITH ME?

[turbosprentice]

ugh... and that's a muscle car? lol

[alienviking]

Beats the crap out of Challenger and Mustang, that is for certain. In fact this might throw an interesting problem into my Corvette plans..

[Fearell]

Doesn't do anything for me.

[mikes2nd]

that interior is fricking sweet...

YouTube - Camaro startup

and you guys somehow think Mopar made the "best" performance vehicles?

Cmon Corvette? What did Dodge ever make back then that could even come close?

In the late 60's they made crap, GM had the Chevelle SS... The 442, the Judge...

427 Corvette? runs circles around anything Dodge could put together so lets get real. The old mopars look good but thats about it. a 3800 lb 250 hp car with the supension of a go cart is nothing to write home about. Unless you got the 426 hemi and then you could run a 13 second quarter finally.

and dont quote the "daytona charger"... only 500 were specially made for nascar...

Ill rest my case
1967 Shelby GT500 and Corvette 427 Sting Ray - Road Test - Motor Trend

GM > Ford > Mopar.

Mopars were only drag cars if that. Dodge didnt know how to make a car that cornered until the viper showed up

[jtvr4]

I like chevy, but im not enough of a fanboi to say I like the new camaro.