View Single Post
Old 02-21-2007, 11:24 AM   #21 (permalink)
TooFast4Radar
Moderator
 
TooFast4Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Drives: The real 94/96/99
Trader Rating: (4)
TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7TooFast4Radar Level 7
Default Re: Recall faulty ECU's for years 91-95 3000GT and Stealth

Quote:
Originally Posted by jandoaudio
Maybe everyone should sell their car and buy a kia with a warranty It is rediculous the number of people who have something go wrong with a SIXTEEN YEAR OLD car and since more than one has broken, expect the manufacturer to replace it. Shit wears out, get over it. The Tcase was a gift for all those who don't check their oil. Just because you could afford to buy the car doesn't mean you can afford to drive it, stop looking for handouts from other people to fix your problems

BTW, I had a 91 RT/TT before my 95 and I replaced the caps in it, no big deal, just a little preventative maintenance. The car was 13 years old at that point, the fact everything still worked as well as it did on a car that complicated was incredible
I totally agree. The TC may be a design issue of sorts since people have sealed the TC themselves and had it leak. Mine has had a very slow leak ever after I resealed it myself 4 years ago. I knew it was leaking long before the recall and just kept an eye on it. It was just one of those things I took along with owning the car. I can see a TC or seatbelts that fail causing a total loss of control of the vehicle or your body during an impact, but an ECU is starting to get a little rediculous.

It really isn't Mitsubishi's fault that they couldn't travel into the future to see what parts would start to fail 13 years after the warranty went out.
__________________
- 94 R/T Turbo
- 93 VR-4
- 94 R/T
-
TooFast4Radar is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement