Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlmosN8kd
the VR-4/R/T TT is not any more or less reliable than an SL, they are built off of the same platform. I guess the big difference is that the TT's have more moving parts to maintain but the gains are so much more worthwhile. If you are planning to buy a 3/S you won't be disappointed with the TT. You should test drive both; after you let those turbos kick in and put you back in the seat, it just isn't the same going N/A.
|
i own both an N/A and a TT. My TT has 10 thousand more miles than my n/a, but yet my n/a is literally falling apart. The only problme ive had with my TT is i blew the motor ( but that was my falt) so far with the na the ecu has gone twice, several pointless (but needed and expensive) sensors have gone bad, both front struts have went, the tranny grinds compulsivly and to make matters worse just small things keep falling apart on the car. For example my door panels are just coming off. Its almost like mitsu used less quality parts on the n/a's just to keep their prices down. Kinda why imo all na parts are cheaper than TT parts.