Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mikes95RT
In the time it took you to do that you could have already replaced the entire NA harness with the TT harness. Then all you would have needed to do is plug in the resistor box. If you were not running a stand alone running the TT ECU stops you from needing a huge correction from a piggy back to get the fuel right. I can run 450cc with about -10% correction. I don't think you can get enough correction out of a NA ECU to run anything larger then 360's. I know this doesn't apply to you because you are going with a stand alone but I don't see why the average Joe would want to run the NA ECU when the TT ECU has been proven to give you 50 H.P. increase by just plugging it in. J.B. saw a 50h.p. increase from the NA ECU to the TT ECU and was able to retune w/o large corrections. Timming advance just blows and when you are running your SAFC at -50% then what would you expect.
|
The TT harness I had was a 91, and my car is a 93. I wanted to stay with the current 93+ CAS system which many feel is more accurate than the Cam Angle Sensor on 91-92. So in short, this was the easy route
Also, it is easier to get a hold of the resistor pack then an entire harness with the resistor pack. It is also cheaper. So for those looking to save where they can I don't see the problem in doing it this way.
And as mike stated, there is proven power, 40-50HP just in the ecu swap. This is due to correct fuel maps, timing maps, and the way it handles boost. It should not be a consideration, it should be a given. Swap that puppy out. Now for Autos it gets more sticky.