View Single Post
Old 08-09-2003, 06:48 AM   #62 (permalink)
BlackStealth
Verified Seller
 
BlackStealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Drives: 93 RT/TT
Trader Rating: (155)
BlackStealth Level 3BlackStealth Level 3BlackStealth Level 3BlackStealth Level 3
Default

Quote:
Your AFC setting seem very rich. I have a similar setup, and with the FJO, I'm closer to -30 LO across the board, and -30 from 1K to 4K, and -39-39
My car at the time didn't have a fuel rewire mod and ran great with those settings. Now that I did the Erik Gross fuel rewire mod, I'm running very rich. So yeah, my settings will be going more negative just as soon as I retune it tonight/tomorrow.

Removing honeycombs from the MAF isn't new to me. The absence of the honeycombs allows more unmetered air. This alone is responsible for the biggest gain more so than what overall air flow restrictions the honeycombs imposed. Some people reported problems when doing this mod on their Talons, but mine worked fine. Once I got a SAFC for the Talon, I had to add alot of postive correction at idle to get the O2s to cycle again. Somewhere in the neighbourhood of +43% correction, and close to 0% correction on the other RPM bands. My car still had stock injectors, and the purpose of the mod was to avoid fuel cut. The hacked MAF reported less Hz (airflow) to the ECU and never reached the critical fuel cut Hz flow number.

After reading the success of Innovator's mod I'm a little torn. Stick with the MAFT+LS6 MAF mod and live with high timing or mod the stock MAF & have reasonable timing numbers.
BlackStealth is offline   Reply With Quote